THE WAY TO THE REALIZATION OF
THE UNIVERSAL RELIGION
(Delivered in the Universalist Church, Pasadena,
California, January 28, 1900)
N0 SEARCH HAS BEEN DEARER to the human heart than that which brings to
us light from God. No study has taken so much human energy, whether in times past or
present, as the study of the soul, of God, and of human destiny. However deeply immersed
we are in our daily occupations, in our ambitions, in our work, sometimes in the midst of
the greatest of our struggles there comes a pause; the mind stops and wants to know
something beyond this world. Sometimes it catches glimpses of a realm beyond the senses,
and a struggle to get at it is the result. Thus it has been throughout the ages in all
countries. Man has wanted to look beyond, wanted to expand himself; and all that we call
progress, evolution, has always been measured by that one search, the search for human
destiny, the search for God.
As our social struggles are represented, among different nations, by
different social organizations, so man's spiritual struggles are represented by various
religions. And as different social organizations are constantly quarrelling, are
constantly at war with each other, so these spiritual organizations have been constantly
at war with each other, constantly quarrelling. Men belonging to a particular social
organization claim that the right to live belongs only to them, and so long as they can,
they want to exercise that right at the cost of the weak. We know that just now there is a
fierce struggle of that sort going on in South Africa.' Similarly each religious sect has
claimed the exclusive right to live. And thus we find that though nothing has brought man
more blessings than religion, yet at the same time there is nothing that has brought him
more horror than religion. Nothing has made more for peace and love than religion; nothing
has engendered fiercer hatred than religion. Nothing has made the brotherhood of man more
tangible than religion; nothing has bred more bitter enmity between man and man than
religion. Nothing has built more charitable institutions, more hospitals for men and even
for animals, than religion; nothing has deluged the world with more blood than religion.
We know, at the same time, that there has always been an opposing
undercurrent of thought; there have always been parties of men, philosophers, students of
comparative religion, who have tried and are still trying to bring about harmony in the
midst of all these jarring and discordant sects. As regards certain countries these
attempts have succeeded, but as regards the whole world they have failed. Then again,
there are some religions, which have come down to us from the remotest antiquity, imbued
with the idea that all sects should be allowed to live-that every sect has a meaning, a
great idea, imbedded in it, and therefore all sects are necessary for the good of the
world and ought to be helped. In modern times the same idea is prevalent, and attempts are
made from time to time to reduce it to practice. But these attempts do not always come up
to our expectations, up to the required efficiency. Nay, to our great disappointment, we
sometimes find that we are quarrelling all the more.
Now, leaving aside dogmatic study and taking a common-sense view of the
thing, we find at the start that there is a tremendous life-power in all the great
religions of the world. Some may say that they are unaware of this; but ignorance is no
excuse. If a man says, "I do not know what is going on in the external world,
therefore the things that are said to be going on there do not exist," that plea is
inexcusable. Now, those of you who are watching the movement of religious thought all over
the world are perfectly aware that not one of the great religions of the world has died.
Not only so; each one of them is progressing. The Christians are multiplying, the
Mohammedans are multiplying, and the Hindus are gaining ground; the Jews also are
increasing in numbers, and as a result of their activities all over the world, the fold of
Judaism is constantly expanding.
Only one religion of the world-an ancient, great religion-is dwindling
away, and that is the religion of Zoroastrianism, the religion of the ancient Persians.
After the Mohammedan conquest of Persia, about a hundred thousand of these people came to
India and took shelter there, and some remained in Persia. Those who were in Persia, under
the constant persecution of the Mohammedans, dwindled till there are at most only ten
thousand. In India there are about eighty thousand of them, but they do not increase. Of
course, there is an initial difficulty: they do not convert others to their religion. And
then, this handful of persons living in India, with the pernicious custom of
cousin-marriage, does not multiply. With this single exception, all the great religions
are living, spreading, and increasing.
We must remember that all the great religions of the world are very
ancient-not one has been formed at the present time-and that every religion of the world
had its origin in the region between the Ganges and the Euphrates. Not one great religion
has arisen in Europe; not one in America-not one. Every religion is of Asiatic origin and
belongs to that part of the world. If what the modern scientists say is true, that the
survival of the fittest is the test, these religions prove by their still being alive that
they are yet fit for some people. And there is a reason why they should live: they bring
good to many. Look at the Mohammedans, how they are spreading in some places in southern
Asia, and spreading like wildfire in Africa. The Buddhists are spreading over central Asia
all the time. The Hindus, like the Jews, do not convert others; still, gradually other
races are coming within Hinduism and adopting the manners and customs of the Hindus and
falling into line with them. Christianity, you all know, is spreading-though I am not sure
that the results are equal to the energy put forth. The Christians' attempt at propaganda
has one tremendous defect, and that is the defect of all Western institutions: the machine
consumes ninety per cent of the energy; there is too much machinery. Preaching has always
been the business of the Asiatics. The Western people are grand in organization-social
institutions, armies, governments, and so forth. But when it comes to preaching religion,
they cannot come near the Asiatics, whose business it has been all the time-and they know
it, and do not use too much machinery.
This, then, is a fact in the present history of the human race: that
all these great religions exist and are spreading and multiplying. Now, there is a
meaning, certainly, to this; and had it been the will of an all-wise and all-merciful
Creator that one of these religions should alone exist and the rest die, it would have
become a fact long, long ago. If it were a fact that only one of these religions was true
and all the rest were false, by this time it would have covered the whole world. But this
is not so; not one has gained all the ground. All religions sometimes advance, sometimes
decline. Now, just think of this: in your own country there are more than sixty millions
of people, and only twenty-one millions profess a religion of some sort. So it is not
always progress. In every country, probably, if the statistics were taken, you would find
that the religions sometimes progress and sometimes go back. Sects are multiplying all the
time. If the claim of any one religion that it has all the truth, and that God has given
it all that truth in a certain book, be true, why then are there so many sects? Not fifty
years pass before there are twenty sects founded upon the same book. If God has put all
the truth in certain books, He does not give us those books in order that we may quarrel
over texts. That seems to be the fact. Why is this? Even if a book were given by God which
contained all the truth about religion, it would not serve the purpose, because nobody
could understand the book. Take the Bible, for instance, and all the sects that exist
among the Christians. Each one puts its own interpretation upon the same text, and each
says that it alone understands that text and all the rest are wrong. So with every
religion. There are many sects among the Mohammedans and among the Buddhists, and hundreds
among the Hindus.
Now, I place these facts before you in order to show you that any
attempt to bring all humanity to one method of thinking in spiritual things has been a
failure and always will be a failure. Every man who starts a theory, even at the present
day, finds that if he goes twenty miles away from his followers they will make twenty
sects. You see that happening all the time. You cannot make all conform to the same ideas;
that is a fact, and I thank God that it is so. I am not against any sect. I am glad that
sects exist, and I only wish they may go on multiplying more and more. Why? Simply because
of this: If you and I and all who are present here were to think exactly the same
thoughts, there would be no thoughts for us to think. We know that two or more forces must
come into collision in order to produce motion. It is the clash of thought, the
differentiation of thought, that awakens thought. Now, if we all thought alike, we should
be like Egyptian mummies in a museum, looking vacantly at one another's faces-no more than
that. Whirls and eddies occur only in a rushing, living stream. There are no whirlpools in
stagnant, dead water.
When religions are dead, there will be no more sects; it will be the
perfect peace and harmony of the grave. But so long as mankind thinks, there will be
sects. Variation is the sign of life, and it must be there. I pray that sects may multiply
so that at last there will be as many sects as human beings and each one will have his own
method, his individual method of thought, in religion.
Such a situation, however, exists already. Each one of us is thinking
in his own way. But this natural thinking has been obstructed all the time and is still
being obstructed. If the sword is not used directly, other means are used. Just hear what
one of the best preachers in New York says. He preaches that the Filipinos should be
conquered because that is the only way to teach Christianity to them! They are already
Catholics; but he wants to make them Presbyterians, and for this he is ready to lay all
this terrible sin of bloodshed upon his race. How terrible! And this man is one of the
greatest preachers of this country, one of the best informed men. Think of the state of
the world when a man like that is not ashamed to stand up and utter such arrant nonsense;
and think of the state of the world when an audience cheers him. Is this civilization? It
is the old blood-thirstiness of the tiger, the cannibal, the savage, coming out once more
under new names in new circumstances. What else can it be? If such is the state of things
now, think of the horrors through which the world passed in olden times, when every sect
was trying, by every means in its power, to tear to pieces the other sects. History shows
that the tiger in us is only asleep; it is not dead. When opportunities come it lumps up
and, as of old, uses its claws and fangs. And apart from the sword, apart from material
weapons, there are weapons still more terrible: contempt, social hatred, and social
ostracism.
Now, these afflictions that are hurled against persons who do not think
exactly in the same way we do are the most terrible of all afflictions. And why should
everybody think just as we do? I do not see any reason. If I am a rational man, I should
be glad that they do not think just as I do. I do not want to live in a grave-like land. I
want to be a man in a world of men. Thinking beings must differ; difference is the first
sign of thought. If I am a thoughtful man, certainly I ought to like to live among
thoughtful persons, where there are differences of opinion.
Then arises the question: How can all this variety be true? If one
thing is true, its negation is false. How can contradictory opinions be true at the same
time? This is the question which I intend to answer. But I shall first ask you: Are all
the religions of the world really contradictory? I do not mean the external forms in which
great thoughts are clad. I do not mean the different buildings, languages, rituals, books,
and so forth, employed in various religions, but I mean the internal soul of every
religion. Every religion has a soul behind it, and that soul may differ from the soul of
another religion; but are they contradictory? Do they contradict or supplement each
other?-that is the question.
I took up this question when I was quite a boy, and have been studying
it all my life. Thinking that my conclusion may be of some help to you, I place it before
you. I believe that they are not contradictory; they are supplementary. Each religion, as
it were, takes up one part of the great, universal truth and spends its whole force in
embodying and typifying that part of the great truth. It is therefore addition, not
exclusion. That is the idea. System after system arises, each one embodying a great ideal;
ideals must be added to ideals. And this is how humanity marches on.
Man never progresses from error to truth, but from truth to truth-from
lesser truth to higher truth, but never from error to truth. The child may develop more
than the father; but was the father inane? The child is the father plus something else. If
your present stage of knowledge is much higher than the stage you were in when you were a
child, would you look down upon that earlier stage now? Will you look back and call it
inanity? Your present stage is the knowledge of childhood plus something more.
Then again, we know that there may be almost contradictory points of
view of a thing, but they all point to the same thing. Suppose a man is journeying towards
the sun and as he advances he takes a photograph of the sun at every stage. When he comes
back, he has many photographs of the sun, which he places before us. We see that no two
are alike; and yet who will deny that all these are photographs of the same sun, from
different standpoints? Take four photographs of this church from different corners. How
different they would look! And yet they would all represent this church. In the same way,
we are all looking at truth from different standpoints, which vary according to our birth,
education, surroundings, and so on. We are viewing truth, getting as much of it as these
circumstances will permit, colouring it with our own feelings, understanding it with our
own intellects, and grasping it with our own minds. We can know only as much of truth as
is related to us, as much of it as we are able to receive. This makes the difference
between man and man and sometimes even occasions contradictory ideas. Yet we all belong to
the same great, universal truth.
My idea, therefore, is that all these religions are different forces in
the economy of God, working for the good of mankind, and that not one can become dead, not
one can be killed. Just as you cannot kill any force in nature, so you cannot kill any one
of these spiritual forces. You have seen that each religion is living. From time to time
it may retrogress or go forward. At one time it may be shorn of a good many of its
trappings; at another time it may be covered with all sorts of trappings. But all the
same, the soul is ever there; it can never be lost. The ideal which every religion
represents is never lost, and so every religion is intelligently on the march.
Books
Photographs
Incense
Videos
Order Form
Book of the Month
Search
View Cart
Check Out Now
Copyright© 1996,
Ramakrishna-Vivekananda Center of New York.
For more books like this
TOP |